Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/7457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhamed, V.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-09T04:48:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-09T04:48:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationAhamed, V. K. (2024). Towards Effective Judicial Review Mechanism: Comparative Insights into Supreme Court Contempt Decisions. Proceedings: University of Colombo Annual Research Symposium 2024, p.141.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2815-0481-
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/7457-
dc.description.abstractThe Contempt of Court, Tribunal, or Institution Act, No. 8 of 2024 was introduced to standardise procedures and clarify punitive measures for contempt convictions in Sri Lanka. However, critical deficiencies persist within the Act, particularly the lack of avenues for judicial remedies against Supreme Court verdicts on contempt charges, which remains a pivotal issue. Drawing on comparative analysis with the legal frameworks of the United Kingdom and India, the research underscores the effectiveness of their review mechanisms in ensuring accountability and preventing potential miscarriages of justice in contempt convictions. The research proposes constitutional amendments in Sri Lanka to institute a similar review mechanism tailored to the nation’s legal landscape. By adopting such provisions, Sri Lanka can mitigate the risk of miscarriages of justice, uphold judicial integrity, and reinforce public confidence in the judiciary. This paper examines the feasibility and...en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Colomboen_US
dc.subjectContempt of Courten_US
dc.subjectAppealen_US
dc.subjectJudicial Reviewen_US
dc.subjectMiscarriage of Justiceen_US
dc.subjectFairnessen_US
dc.titleTowards Effective Judicial Review Mechanism: Comparative Insights into Supreme Court Contempt Decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Private & Comparative Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Towards Effective Judicial Review Mechanism Comparative Insights ......pdf94.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.