Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/7432
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wijayarathna, K.A.U.I. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-29T04:53:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-29T04:53:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Wijayarathna, K. A. U. I. (2024). Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders in Sri Lanka: A Comparative Legal Analysis with the United Kingdom and Australia. Proceedings: University of Colombo Annual Research Symposium 2024, p.139. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2815-0481 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/7432 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A Resuscitation Plan is a medically authorised order to use or withhold resuscitation interventions. Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order concepts are widely used in healthcare systems in developed countries to assist in the delivery of high-quality care, particularly for individuals who are at the end of life and for whom palliative approaches, rather than aggressive medical care, are most appropriate. These orders uphold patient autonomy, ensuring that medical interventions align with individual values and preferences. The existing laws relating to DNR orders in Sri Lanka seem to be incomplete and perhaps lacking comprehensive provisions. The main objective of this research is to explore the current legal state of DNR orders in Sri Lanka and gain insights for a comprehensive legal framework, through a comparative legal analysis with the well-established legal frameworks in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. For this purpose, the following aspects are addressed in this paper: (i) the legal and ethical challenges related to DNR orders in Sri Lanka; (ii) legal frameworks for DNR orders in the UK and Australia compared to those in Sri Lanka; and, (iii) evidence-based recommendations for developing a robust and ethically sound framework for DNR orders in Sri Lanka. This research employs a qualitative methodology, focusing on the comparative analysis of legal and ethical frameworks. The study involves a thorough review of relevant literature, legal documents, guidelines, and policies from Sri Lanka, the UK, and Australia. Comparative legal analysis ... | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Colombo | en_US |
dc.subject | DNR Orders | en_US |
dc.subject | End-of-life Decision-making | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Law | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient Autonomy | en_US |
dc.title | Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders in Sri Lanka: A Comparative Legal Analysis with the United Kingdom and Australia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Private & Comparative Law |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders in Sri Lanka A Comparative Legal Analysis.....pdf | 94.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.