Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6951
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hishaam, U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jeyasugiththan, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Satharasinghe, D. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Senanayake, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kumarihami, A. M. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ranaweera, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pallewatte, A. S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peterson, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T04:01:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T04:01:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6951 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background or Introduction: ATCM reduces dose by adapting tube current to maintain a specified target image quality throughout CT scans and across patients of varying sizes. Scanners modulate current differently: angularly around the patient or along the z-axis; using a reference image or chosen noise/dose reference levels. When misapplied, ATCM can subject patients to excessive radiation doses or produce images of non-diagnostic quality. Thus, evaluating the impact scanner parameters have on radiation dose is vital. Material and Methods: A 2-step phantom containing an air pocket, to mimic the lungs, was used to conduct a preliminary study(Philips BRILLIANCE iCT Scanner) where parameters were varied to evaluate their impact on tube current. Using the results, a customized phantom—5 diameter steps(16- 32cm), a cone, and an air pocket—was built. A comprehensive study on how varying pitch values, tube voltage, and DoseRight index(ATCM setting) impact the TCM for patients represented by this phantom followed. Results & Discussion: Preliminary Study: changing tube voltage from 120kVp-100kVp increased the tube current—patient radiation exposure—by 38%, and 42% when changed from 120kVp-80kVp. At 120kVP, when the DoseRight Index was changed from 15-20, current values increased by 42%, and from 15-25 this increase was 68%. At 100kVp, when DRI changed from 10-15 the current increased by about 43%, and 10-20 showed a 67% increase. Similarly, at 80kVp, a change of DRI from 10-15 resulted in a 33% increase in tube current. Customized phantom: Data to be collected in September. Conclusion(s): With ATCM, reducing the tube voltage results in an increase in radiation dose; to compensate for the associated increase in image noise. For multislice CT scanners, pitch value has minimal impact, but DoseRight Index shows a strong positive correlation with tube current. In-depth analysis of how changes to scanner parameters impact patients of varying sizes will be conducted when the study employing the customized phantom is completed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Asia‑Oceania Federation of Organizations (AFOMP) Congress | en_US |
dc.subject | Computed Tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient Radiation | en_US |
dc.subject | Automatic Tube Current Modulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Dose Optimization | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluating the Impact Exposure Parameters Have on Automatic Tube Current Modulation in a CT Scanner | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Nuclear Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abstract AFOMP 2022.pdf | 104.69 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.