Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/3387
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWasalathanthri, S.
dc.contributor.authorAtapattu, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorNanayakkara, U.
dc.contributor.authorJayasekara, R.J.W.
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-20T07:29:01Z
dc.date.available2012-12-20T07:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationAnnual Research Symposiumen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/3387-
dc.description.abstractTeaching is a multidimensional task which needs continuous evaluation. Peer evaluation is considered superior to student feedback because peer critique usually encompasses expert subject knowledge and teaching-learning strategies. Though peer evaluation may be subjective, this can be minimized by using a pre-formed protocol for observation. Peer review of teaching promotes continuing professional development of individual teachers and is an integral part of quality assurance. Attitudes of academic staff regarding peer evaluation may contribute significantly to the success of the implementation and optimal outcomes of peer evaluation.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleAttitudes on peer evaluation of teaching among academic staff of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Colomboen_US
dc.typeResearch abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AnnualResearchSymposium2012UniversityofColombo.235.pdf24.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.